41.   Difficulties arise where there is more than one defendant.

42.   There had been a bulb on the staircase but this had been removed by a stranger, for whose actions the defendants were not responsible.

43.   The defendants were aware of this but took no steps to keep the children out.

44.   The first defendants were liable because they had an opportunity to examine the tool.

45.   The second defendants were liable because they could not rely on such an examination taking place.

46.   It was held by the House of Lords that the defendants were not negligent as they had conformed to a practice approved by one responsible body of medical opinion.

47.   As the defendants were unable to rebut the inference of negligence they were liable.

48.   The court held that the Secretary of State had no jurisdiction to grant a warrant and the defendants were guilty of trespass.

49.   The defendant is Albright and Wilson, manufacturer of chemicals for detergents and toiletries.

50.   Where the plaintiff obtains such an order, the defendant may not be able to make an effective payment in.