1.   The Court of Appeal held that this was sufficient to entitle the plaintiffs to an interlocutory injunction.

2.   The Lords had initially upheld the interlocutory injunctions although the House subsequently refused to make the injunctions permanent.

3.   An interlocutory injunction, preventing further infringement, may be available before that date.

4.   Nevertheless, the court granted the plaintiff an interlocutory injunction even though the plaintiff had previously engaged in comparative advertising.

5.   Remedies available are injunctions, including interlocutory injunctions, and damages.

6.   The plaintiffs made an application for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendant from disclosing to the regulatory body or to the revenue its confidential information or documents.