41.   The court held that the effect of these conditions was that no agreement to appoint the expert had taken place, and the whole procedure was invalid.

42.   First, a court might hold that there was no authority to make the rule and invalidate it.

43.   If they do not the court may hold a rule invalid.

44.   The court might hold that the rule was directly inconsistent with other exchange rules relating to the existence of cash-settled contracts, and order rectification.

45.   The court has held that it means something more than useful, reasonable or desirable.

46.   The court held that the defendants were guilty of a breach of confidence.

47.   A court could therefore hold that other rights are also included in the definition.

48.   A court could hold the clause reasonable in relation to the claim for short delivery but not to the claim in respect of latent defects.

49.   The court held that a new car which is damaged and then repaired so as to be as good as new can still be regarded as new.

50.   An Arizona state court held that the discussion could not be used because it was privileged.