101.   Prosecutors argued that the request was too broad, but Sand disagreed.

102.   Prosecutors argued that Yates knew the difference between right and wrong and should be held accountable.

103.   Prosecutors had argued that he was killed to prevent any trials over wartime atrocities.

104.   Prosecutors had argued that McKinney was a calculating sexual predator who pressured and threatened women for sex and manufactured an alibi to cover his tracks.

105.   Prosecutors had argued that the law is critical to public safety, and expressed concern over the injunction banning police from distributing information about the two convicts.

106.   Prosecutors had argued that they needed to retain all crime scene blood samples so they could verify their results at a second laboratory.

107.   Prosecutors have argued that Archer Daniels executives used the method of fixing prices of citric acid as a model in the subsequent lysine conspiracy.

108.   Prosecutors have argued that there is no basis in law for a protective privilege.

109.   Prosecutors have long argued that preliminary hearings would crush an already overburdened judiciary.

110.   Prosecutors will likely argue that that level of involvement shows that many Andersen officials knew an investigation would eventually include their Enron documents as well.