101.   The company also argues that it has improved the health of the television industry by increasing the market value of stations.

102.   The company also today argued the addition of a non-prescription drug would increase the number of consumers likely to seek the advice of a doctor about their cholesterol levels.

103.   The company argued that it was entitled, under federal law, to buy power at federally approved rates and recover the costs from customers.

104.   The company argued that that rate was sufficient to justify FDA approval.

105.   The company argued that the drivers were independent contractors because they owned their cars, set their own hours and could seek customers wherever they wanted.

106.   The company argued that the law violated its First Amendment right to free speech.

107.   The company argued that the order violated the First Amendment and that enforcement was inappropriate because the posted material was not intended for French viewers.

108.   The company argues that a gleaming new casino, safe and convenient to the major hotels, can still prove to be a powerful tourist draw.

109.   The company argues that it is currently subsidizing the retirements of employees from other companies, including workers whose employers have declared bankruptcy.

110.   The company argues that its success in restoring telephone service to Lower Manhattan demonstrates the importance to the nation of large telecommunications companies.