1. The car had previously been in a collision caused by the negligence of the first defendant. 2. The second defendant damaged the same part of the car as the first defendant. 3. What is the position when the first defendant is sued and the second defendant has caused similar or greater damage? 4. The negligence of the first defendant caused an accident. 5. He was struck by a vehicle driven by the first defendant. 6. The first defendants lent a grinding tool owned by the second defendants to the plaintiff. 7. The first defendants were liable because they had an opportunity to examine the tool. 8. Those solicitors, the first defendant, realised what had happened and did not at first read the papers. 9. In support of the application he sought a report from the first defendant, an independant consultant psychiatrist. |