1.   As in many other areas of the law, the standard applied is what the reasonable person would believe under similar circumstances.

2.   Bond language will also have to be specific and clear enough that a reasonable person can understand it.

3.   But in this case, enough variations on the simple alternatives exist to drive a reasonable person to distraction.

4.   Given the context, a reasonable person could only conclude that the threat of judicial power was plainly implied.

5.   Any reasonable person should be expected to know the difference between right and wrong.

6.   However, the reasonable person, while imbued with the knowledge the accused acquired throughout the crime, is not imbued with the mistaken beliefs he had.

7.   Whether the act was dangerous was to be judged by what the reasonable person would have appreciated.

8.   What must be ascertained is the intention that a reasonable person would have had if placed in the situation of the parties.