1.   A second criticism is that the theory assumes that all emotional response is the same.

2.   A second criticism is the assertion that it is impossible to develop a science of politics because of the subject matter.

3.   A third criticism is that the analysis of politics can not be objective in the way assumed by the scientific method.

4.   As a consultant specialising in environmental impact assessments and environmental audits I feel that this criticism is rather unfair.

5.   As criticism is the backbone of the scientific method, this accounts for the indentations permanently sunk into my chest.

6.   Criticism should always be a positive move along the road to high profits.

7.   However, there are certain criticisms which must be levelled at this provision.

8.   I want to develop the stronger thesis that criticism is the essence of higher education.

9.   If such criticisms are valid, is a sterner, more restrictive approach either desirable or likely to be effective?