1.   Before the election, the commission adopted a regulation saying blank slips are invalid.

2.   The Central Election Commission said there was no record of how many of these were blank slips and how many were disqualified for other reasons.

3.   The petitioners argued that before the election, the Central Election Commission adopted a regulation saying blank slips are invalid.

4.   Therefore the petitioners claim it is illegal, and the blank slips should be included in the total number of valid votes.

5.   Therefore the petitioners claim the interpretation is illegal and the blank slips should be included in the total number of valid votes.

6.   Therefore the petitioners claim the law is invalid, and the blank slips should be included in the total number of valid votes.

7.   Therefore the petitioners claimed it was illegal, and the blank slips should be included in the total number of valid votes.