81.   Prosecutors also argued that the documents on which Field was to be examined were either irrelevant, or their origin uncertain, because Field had not prepared them.

82.   Prosecutors argued it proved nothing.

83.   Prosecutors argued that Jackson-Knight admitted that he and two accomplices set the fire on the roof.

84.   Prosecutors argued that the brothers killed out of hatred and greed.

85.   Prosecutors argued that the e-mail message was an instruction aimed at limiting the potential evidence that could be used against Andersen.

86.   Prosecutors argued that the evidence should be allowed, with an explanation to jurors about the possibility of false positives.

87.   Prosecutors argued that the gift was aimed at influencing Espy to relax regulations aimed at promoting safe meat handling.

88.   Prosecutors argued that the property was connected to the criminal offenses.

89.   Prosecutors argued that the release of such information would hamper their search for the killer.

90.   Prosecutors argued Thursday that the jury should be told that several Andersen employees did not testify during the trial because they invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.