31.   The court in Greenstein said that an accused could be dishonest even though no one lost any money.

32.   The accused is guilty if he obtains property for someone else.

33.   Therefore, the accused was not guilty of that offence.

34.   The accused may be guilty even though he does not in ordinary language obtain a service.

35.   The accused was under a duty to provide the information so that the hospital could charge properly.

36.   The principal difference between this offence and the others in this chapter is that the accused is guilty of making off whether or not he deceived anyone.

37.   The accused is therefore not guilty of this offence if she drafts a worthless cheque.

38.   The accused was never bound to pay on the spot for the service.

39.   Similarly, the accused is guilty where ownership passes on delivery such as when food is eaten or petrol put into the tank.

40.   The accused had been involved in a robbery.