111.   The case was sent back to the U.S. District Court in the state Washington for further hearings.

112.   The appeals court majority sent the case back to a Washington federal court for trial.

113.   The appeals court sent the case back down to the trial judge for further proceeding.

114.   The appeals court sent the case back to a trial court for further consideration about whether the benefits of the rules outweigh the costs.

115.   The appeals court sent the case back to a trial judge for further proceedings about how California should set rates.

116.   The appeals court sent the case back to district court for a new remedy trial, and mandated that a new judge preside.

117.   The case was sent back to district court.

118.   The case was sent back to the trial court for further proceedings.

119.   The case was sent to Santa Monica to comply with local court rules that now virtually require that cases be tried in the jurisdiction where the crimes occurred.

120.   The case will be sent back to the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles for trial.