111. On substance, the amendment was bad policy. 112. Opponents said the amendment was inappropriate and could cause a presidential veto. 113. Other amendments are more symbolic. 114. Only maps introduced as bills or amendments will be available. 115. Other opponents say the amendment is a solution in search of a problem. 116. Opponents argued the amendment was bigoted. 117. Opponents said the amendment is in opposition to the principle of majority rule. 118. Opponents said the amendment was a gimmick that would corrupt the Constitution. 119. Opponents, though, suggested that the amendment was the first step on a slippery slope. 120. Other states have taken slightly different approaches, but all would be vulnerable if the Supreme Court agrees with the Arkansas court that the Arkansas amendment is unconstitutional. |